Independent advice on AI risk and governance, for the institution that carries the risk.
Get in touch →
For 40 years I have worked in technology — the first decade in telecommunications, the 30 years since in financial services — starting as an engineer, growing into leadership and ultimately advising organisations at board level on their most consequential technology decisions: capital markets, global banks and government agencies across Asia and Europe. Swiss by origin, I live in Malaysia and run my advisory practice from here.
From 2019 to 2022, I served as Technology Advisor to the Board of Bursa Malaysia. I attended board sessions as an independent technology advisor through the COVID-19 pandemic, advising on IT governance, cybersecurity and digital transformation at the highest level.
Before that, I spent nearly 20 years at IBM in financial services, across Switzerland, Europe and ASEAN — in roles including Distinguished Engineer, responsible for IBM's technology strategy and client advisory. I have worked with banks across Switzerland, Europe and Asia.
Today I work as an independent advisor on AI risk and governance. AI is transforming both business and IT — but in different ways. What AI means for the business is a different question from what AI means for IT. Generative AI is accelerating both: new business models, new risks and new governance obligations — including the need for boards to understand explainable AI (XAI) and where algorithmic decisions can and cannot be trusted. Both are connected, but each requires a different answer. Every one of those decisions carries a cost that builds quietly before anyone sees it. The work now is to find where that cost is building while it is still a decision and not yet a number in the P&L.
For management teams, continuously — thinking alongside you before decisions are made: generative AI adoption, digital transformation, IT governance, cybersecurity strategy.
For the board and the risk committee — including generative AI and explainable AI (XAI), and the translation of complex technology decisions into terms directors can act on.
Before approval, or once a programme is running and the question is whether it still behaves as approved. Whether the risk categories hold, whether the assurance is evidence or a description of policy, and whether accountability has a name on it. The report belongs to the board.
"I work discreetly with a small number of clients on a retainer basis — thinking through scenarios, weighing options, in a room where anything can be said before it has to be defended in the boardroom."
IBM (Switzerland, Europe, ASEAN), Bursa Malaysia — the full career history is on LinkedIn.
View LinkedIn profile →
A framework for aligning technology infrastructure with strategic business objectives — written for executives and technology leaders navigating large-scale digital transformation.
The central thesis: organisations that neglect their technology backbone pay for it when transformation becomes urgent. In the age of AI, this lesson has never been more relevant — especially for Southeast Asian organisations moving fast on digital.
View on Amazon →The first step is an open conversation — no commitment, fully confidential. Whether you are a board looking for independent technology oversight, a management team navigating AI adoption, or a risk committee preparing to approve an AI programme, I am happy to talk.
Based in Malaysia — on-site where needed, remote where practical. Also available in Switzerland and across Southeast Asia.